![]() The method and apparatus for racking billiard balls of claim 1 wherein said distance between the end of each arm at the outer side is 14⅛ inches.ĥ. The method and apparatus for racking billiard balls of claim 1 wherein said distance between the end of each arm at the inner side is 13⅝ inches.Ĥ. The method and apparatus for racking billiard balls of claim 1 said V-shaped ball containment area having a curvature of radius of said apex of 1⅛ inches.ģ. A method and apparatus for racking billiard balls having a V-shaped ball containment area consisting of: A) a pair of arms each having an outer and inner side, said arms meeting at an apex having an inner and outer surface, said arms extending from said apex to create an arc of approximately 60 degrees forming a V B) said inner side of each arm extending at least as far from the inner surface of said apex a distance equal to approximately five times the diameter of a standard billiard ball C) wherein said balls are accessible by a user from the open end of said V D) a connecting side that joins said inner and outer sides of said pair of arms, placing said V-shaped anna on a pool table moving said billiard balls by the user into said V-shaped device into the opening of the V into a tight formation engaging the sides and apex of said V-shaped device and moving said V-shaped device away from said balls in the horizontal plane of the table until said V-shaped device is completely removed from about the balls, thereby leaving the balls in a tight triangular formation.Ģ. I really think that the game of 10-ball should replace 9-ball so you don't have to try to work out all of these solutions, but it doesn't seem like any of the organizations want 10ball.1. Do they not realize that their powerful breaks do more damage to the table than the Sardo rack ever could? The reason why they can't rack the balls tightly with a regular rack at pro tournaments is because all the pros have these monster breaks and it damages the spot, and the areas where they break from. People complain that the Sardo rack leaves tiny divots in the table. I say keep using the Sardo rack but rack it 10 ball and remove the 10th ball. The people who complain about the Sardo rack would probably still complain if it was removed. ![]() ![]() It is much harder to make a ball on the break in a 10 ball rack so this could be a possible solution. The balls are racked just like 10-ball but with the 9 in the middle, and after the balls are broken you remove the 10th ball. A friend of mine suggested to the UPA that for the 9-ball break, they add a tenth ball just for the break. However, people continue to complain about the Sardo rack, because it does it's job well, actually TOO well. In response to this problem, the break box and alternate breaks were implemented in some events. With a perfect rack every time, it becomes much easier to make a ball on the break and as a result players are stringing alot of racks together or at least pocketing balls on the break and controlling the table. Now people are complaining because of that. The Sardo Rack is now the solution to that racking problem, because it gives you a perfect rack every time. ![]() It would take forever to rack the balls because they just couldn't get them to freeze together. I've watched tons of pool videos and quite often they had a problem with racking. With all the complaints about the Sardo rack, what some people forget is that before it was invented, players complained because they couldn't get a good rack.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |